Re: Misleading Notam

Gotta agree with Larry. The whole thing smacks of vertical descent path, not
lateral alignment. Poorly written, for sure. Should at least have had
quotation marks surrounding the phrase between "From" and "degrees."

Bob Gardner

"Greg Esres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> One of our local pilots misunderstood a common Notam, as shown below.
> He thought the "ADD: From Shelby to RW 17: 3.52 degrees" meant add
> 3.52 degrees to the final approach course.
>
> How reasonable do you think his interpretation?
>
> (BTW, the notam just adds a descent gradient to a NP approach.)
>
> FDC 3/0143 M01 FI/T GENERAL DEWITT SPAIN, MEMPHIS, TN. VOR RWY
> 16, ORIG...CHANGE ALL REFERENCES TO RWY 16/34 TO RWY 17/35.
> ADD: FROM SHLBY TO RW 17: 3.52 DEGREES, TCH 31. ADD NOTE: VGSI
> AND DESCENT ANGLES NOT COINCIDENT.
>