Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: FAR 91.157 Operating in icing conditions



FWIW, my 172S POH specifically states "Flight into known icing
prohibited" in the limitations section.  Is doing something
specifically mentioned as prohibited in the POH actionable?

On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 11:28:47 -0500, Dave Butler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Teacherjh wrote:
>>>For us little guys, ANY ICE AT ALL is forbidden.  (unless the aircraft is
>>>certified for known ice, which very few spam cans are).
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> Forbidden by what?
>> <snip> (though I can't find a
>> specific rule, it would certainly be classified as "careless and reckless" if
>> it led to an incident - it might be in the certification rules for aircraft,
> > <snip>
>
>It's usually the aircraft's type certificate that specifies whether it can be 
>flown in ice, but older types don't have any statement about ice in the type 
>certificate.
>
>Remove SHIRT to reply directly.
>Dave




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.