Re: For the recordZZZZZJJJJJJ

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ChuckSlusarczyk says...
>
> > You say you don't care what anyone thinks of you but find it necessary to answer
> > any perceived slight with a torrent of crude name calling and insults.
> > Oh you care all right if you didn't you wouldn't be here on this group.You'd
> > leave and stay away or not respond. You need to act out your macho fantasy's
> > here for some reason only you know and we laugh at. Calling yourself a
> > Journalist is like calling the Jerry Springer Show serious TV.
>
>
> On 2 Dec 2003 04:10:29 -0800, ChuckSlusarczyk
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> :You say you don't care what anyone thinks of you but find it necessary to
> answer
> :any perceived slight with a torrent of crude name calling and insults.
> :Oh you care all right if you didn't you wouldn't be here on this group.You'd
> :leave and stay away or not respond. You need to act out your macho fantasy's
> :here for some reason only you know and we laugh at. Calling yourself a
> :Journalist is like calling the Jerry Springer Show serious TV.
>
> That's an insult to the Jerry Springer Show.
>
> For years, the show has had consistant, reliable ratings.  It delivers exactly
> what it says it will - eyeballs, looking at TV screens during ads.  Jerry
> doesn't say it's high culture, he says it's a circus (hence, the semi-fictional
> "Ringmaster").  The Jerry Springer Show is as serious as any reality TV show.
>
> We will never see "Juan Juimenez - The Opera" playing in the west end.
>
> And there's one other major difference.  Jerry Springer gets paid for what he
> does in media.  Juan does not.
>
> It's more like calling a local cable access show "serious TV."
Plus he has a damn good name also:-)

Jerry(the real one)Springer