Re: Justice Deny Appeal on Earnhardt Autopsy Photos

"Crusader" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Ms.Goodwrench" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lindsay2448) wrote in
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JJ) wrote in message
> > > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > >> "-v-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > >> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > >
> > >> Mz JJ  -- who wonders why the hell anyone would want to see autopsy
> > >> photos anyhoo
> > >
> > > I'm not sure what you'd get out of it, really.  I believe there was an
> > > autopsy report available to the public...what's wrong with that (for
> > > reporting purposes especially)?
> > >
> > > All the same, I question the constitutionality myself.  It has nothing
> > > to do with why these people wanted to see the picture.  In fact, I
> > > think their reasons were pretty unjustified based on what I said
> > > before about just seeing the report and getting adequate information
> > > out of that.  But for this to be allowed as the exception when all
> > > other photos in the past have been accessable to the public isn't
> > > really fair, IMHO.  And again, I don't know why somebody would want to
> > > see it.  I find the idea of looking at an autopsy photo creepy and
> > > sick myself, but Dale was just a man who could drive the hell out of a
> > > race car and died in one.  He was just another man living in the state
> > > who died and had an autopsy performed on him.  And his pictures are
> > > just the same as everyone else's in the regard that he was a mortal
> > > who passed on.
> > >
> > > I can understand that the family would be upset about it.  I feel for
> > > them and therefore, I end up finding some validity in the complaint,
> > > but still, I guess I just don't think that it's 100% fair.
> > > Lindsay
> >
> > Valid points, but it was time the law changed.  We live in a new era,
> > and there's a big market for autopsy photos and death entertainment.
> > Sick, huh?  But true.  There are people and companies swarming to get
> > their hands on death memorabilia, extreme or otherwise.
> >
> > My opinion is it shouldn't be any different than medical records -- 
> > afterall, what is an autopsy but one's final medical record?
> >
> Agreed MzG, but i find it interesting that -v-, of all people, would not
> include in his report that the US Supreme Court, in a related case,
> is deliberating on the Vince Foster case.
>   Can there be something gleaned from VF's autopsy photos as to whether
> he committed suicide as the USGovernment suggests? Or not?
> There is an equivalency with the TV programs in the past 2 weeks
> of the JFK autopsy photos & movie camera video.
>
> Coverups are SOP, but in DE's case it was just a matter of negligence.
> Probably his own personal negligence as MzG has pointed out.
> We all know that N was negligent in providing a safer environment
> for the racers before DE's death, but on the other hand, the drivers
> apparently all signed a 'no fault' contract with NA$CAR.
>
> There really is a difference between DE's autopsy photos & VF's.
> On a similar level, the USG killing of Tim McVeigh was the reason
> i no longer am a proponent of the death penalty.
>   Maybe Tim would have exposed all his accomplices at a later date
> just like Lee Harvey Oswald & Jack Ruby might have. No chance now ;(
>   Susan McDougal of Clinton Whitewater fame & the living
> Branch Davidians still have a slim chance of exposing the ruthless
> methods that the USG still use to this very day.
>
> I have experienced 'black helicopters' UCAP, believe it or not.
> CRUsading for the whole USG truth, even if the American People
> supposedly can't handle the whole truth.
>

Damn. I missed the obvious connection between Dale Earnhardt and Vince
Foster.
Wait a minute I have get under the bed, that pesky black helicopter is back.
-- 
-v-
Only 8 !