Re: Justice Deny Appeal on Earnhardt Autopsy Photos

"Ms.Goodwrench" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lindsay2448) wrote in
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: 
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JJ) wrote in message
> > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... 
> >> "-v-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... 
> > 
> >> Mz JJ  -- who wonders why the hell anyone would want to see autopsy
> >> photos anyhoo
> > 
> > I'm not sure what you'd get out of it, really.  I believe there was an
> > autopsy report available to the public...what's wrong with that (for
> > reporting purposes especially)?
> > 
> > All the same, I question the constitutionality myself.  It has nothing
> > to do with why these people wanted to see the picture.  In fact, I
> > think their reasons were pretty unjustified based on what I said
> > before about just seeing the report and getting adequate information
> > out of that.  But for this to be allowed as the exception when all
> > other photos in the past have been accessable to the public isn't
> > really fair, IMHO.  And again, I don't know why somebody would want to
> > see it.  I find the idea of looking at an autopsy photo creepy and
> > sick myself, but Dale was just a man who could drive the hell out of a
> > race car and died in one.  He was just another man living in the state
> > who died and had an autopsy performed on him.  And his pictures are
> > just the same as everyone else's in the regard that he was a mortal
> > who passed on.
> > 
> > I can understand that the family would be upset about it.  I feel for
> > them and therefore, I end up finding some validity in the complaint,
> > but still, I guess I just don't think that it's 100% fair.
> > Lindsay
> 
> Valid points, but it was time the law changed.  We live in a new era, 
> and there's a big market for autopsy photos and death entertainment.  
> Sick, huh?  But true.  There are people and companies swarming to get 
> their hands on death memorabilia, extreme or otherwise.  
> 
> My opinion is it shouldn't be any different than medical records -- 
> afterall, what is an autopsy but one's final medical record?  
> 
Agreed MzG, but i find it interesting that -v-, of all people, would not
include in his report that the US Supreme Court, in a related case,
is deliberating on the Vince Foster case.
  Can there be something gleaned from VF's autopsy photos as to whether
he committed suicide as the USGovernment suggests? Or not?
There is an equivalency with the TV programs in the past 2 weeks
of the JFK autopsy photos & movie camera video.

Coverups are SOP, but in DE's case it was just a matter of negligence.
Probably his own personal negligence as MzG has pointed out.
We all know that N was negligent in providing a safer environment
for the racers before DE's death, but on the other hand, the drivers
apparently all signed a 'no fault' contract with NA$CAR.

There really is a difference between DE's autopsy photos & VF's.
On a similar level, the USG killing of Tim McVeigh was the reason
i no longer am a proponent of the death penalty.
  Maybe Tim would have exposed all his accomplices at a later date
just like Lee Harvey Oswald & Jack Ruby might have. No chance now ;(
  Susan McDougal of Clinton Whitewater fame & the living
Branch Davidians still have a slim chance of exposing the ruthless
methods that the USG still use to this very day.

I have experienced 'black helicopters' UCAP, believe it or not.
CRUsading for the whole USG truth, even if the American People 
supposedly can't handle the whole truth.