Re: FAQ (Paxton Points)

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Paxton) wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Somebody") wrote 
>
>> I notice that a lot of people arguing with PPS generally push the *concepts*
>> to extreme and argue with that.
>
>I've noticed that too.  :)
>
>
>> They ask "should DNFs not count at all?" -- 
>> PPS does not say this.  It merely softens the blow somewhat -- with the
>> bonus effect of removing rolling wrecks.
>
>Gotta give McGaha credit here.  He has a different philosophy on
>things.  He has expressed it clearly and supported it rationally.  I
>disagree with him on a philosophical level about what makes a champ,
>but at least he's dealing in the real world.
>
>All the "what about 10 wins and 26 DNF's" are just telling me those
>folks can't muster much of an argument against PPS.
>
I won't argue with the PPS results, but getting there is very complex.  :)

Deven Atkinson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Penny Lane Numismatic - Categorized Web Links
http://www.bright.net/~deven/pennylane.htm
ANA Member #1197707