Re: Do CHUMPS share responsibility?

Schnorky writes:
<< Face it, TJ, you'll never get a sraight answer from a CHUMP.
It seems they're incapable of rational, or original thought
on the subject. >>


You should re-read Iian's post.  One thing all you 
IRL-can-do-nothing-wrong-and-I-hate-all-things-CART never get is that the IRL
wasn't formed to "solve" anything.

With the heroic notion of bringing America's short
track drivers back to "the road to Indy," Tony could've set up a sponsorship
for a few deserving
drivers - sort of a "scholarship" or award for
achievement in a ladder system.  (Iian mentions
that specific idea in his post, and it's a far more
original thought than tj's continued search for flaws
in CART).  

It seems you're so desperate to prop up whatever you'd call
the current IRL and the creaking (it won't go away, but I doubt it will ever be
the same) Indy 500, all you can do is jump on CART.

CART wouldn't have the problems it has today if the IRL hadn't been formed, and
neither would Indy.

Now go enjoy your factory teams, engine manufacturers dictating policy, few
American drivers, dismal ratings,
and coming soon, road and maybe street courses.  

>From an IRL point of view, I guess those are "original"
thoughts".  BWWWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!


-Sterling