
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 10:30:42 -0600, "Frank...." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Dale "Friggin" Carnegie wrote: >> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 14:14:06 -0600, "Frank...." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>Spongecake Brainpan wrote: >>>> On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 13:02:29 -0800, "Logan Spitznauer" >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>The one piggy backing on a flat bed lorry. >>>> >>>> Just what is it that's behind this particularly European perversion of >>>> fitting filthy choking stuttering diesel motors to otherwise decent >>>> automobiles? ...And, while were at it; the singularly English >>>> fetishism of "replica kit cars"? >>> >>>Don't know about the emissions but the diesel VW camper I drove to Le Mans >>>was indistingushable from a gasoline engine, except at idle. Then it had >>>the sound but never the smoke. Not once did I see any smoke and the smell >>>was rarely evident, even when I ran it for a half hour or so to charge the >>>battery. >> >> I got stuck, and I mean stuck; behind a diesel Golf this morning... >> >> Spewing soot like a 19th century locomotive, it turned the freshly >> fallen snow on the hood of my car sooty-London-black in the 30sec it >> took to get around it... And diesel is more expensive than >> high-octane in these parts. >> >> ...What a bloody farce. > >I assume it was a new one we're talking about as the there is no question >that the older ones were awful to be behind. > >Admittedly I haven't paid much attention to them, but the fact that I >haven't _had_ to pay any attention to them tells me that they've come a >long way. I will be looking for them now though....You have piqued my >curiosity. To be truthful; it was almost as old as I am... But it doesn't seem to matter; Mercedes, Volvo or VW: The diesel versions are all obvious, notorious and, to a driving enthusiast, dreadful.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |