
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 13:02:26 GMT, Mike Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Betts > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> Sorry, but neither of those responses make a lot of sense to me. The > >> Australian GP is the biggest and most important race in Australia for > >> that year. > > > >Out of curiousity, how do you know that, and what criteria are you > >basing it on? > > That's it is an FIA-sanctioned Grand Prix for F1 cars, of course. > Australia's most important domestic series is for V8 tin-top > dinosaurs. Very entertaining and they race on some exciting tracks, > but hardly rocket science <g>. Yebbut that's what I was getting at, the Bathurst is (probably) the biggest and most important race to Australians. Or maybe WSB or MotoGP might be, as one had an Australian champion a couple of years ago and the other has got that champion currently riding in it, plus another Aussie, and Mick Doohan used to be in it... > Only one of those races has any > international status or interest. They don't have a worthwhile big > single-seater series any more, although they used to. That's the perspective of the outsider though, isn't it? I don't know which of the races is the most important to Aussies. -- Mike Fleming
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |