Re: JPM to McLaren for 05

David Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2003 16:09:10 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark
> Jackson) wrote:

> > Of course it's unlikely that Williams could
> >not guess that JPM was pretty much tied up for 2005, but perhaps
> >McLaren calculated that the increased pressure resulting from a public
> >announcement would disrupt JPM's performance at Williams more than DC's
> >performance for *them*.
> 
> A touch Machiavellian, don't you think?

Well, perhaps you're right - if it's only a *touch* Machiavellian it's
probably too straightforward for Formula 1.  :-)

> Actually, I can think of a
> couple of people who've won championships only to find they were out
> of work. I have a hunch that the 2004 McLaren is going to be the class
> of the field and that luck and experience may play to DC over Kimi.

I think that would be interesting, but see no particular reason to
expect more from DC next year.

-- 
Mark Jackson - http://www.alumni.caltech.edu/~mjackson
        I was going for a fair dose of irony and satire, and what
        could be better than using Powerpoint and a projector?
                                        - David Byrne