
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
J Forbes wrote: > > Jeff Rice wrote: > > I don't mind the rule. > > I just don't like people lying about the year of manufacture to get around > > the rule. > > It's a definition, not a rule. And part of the definition includes > "cars that look like 1948 or older...." so the replicars kind of fit the > definition. But most steet rodders look askance at the replicars, > unless they're (good) replicas of things like 32 or 34 fords.... > > actually, if they are that "purist" any replicars shouldnt be allowed, then they will go the way of the dinasours..... ;) and to stretch it a lot, a 97-03 Dodge pickup would fit that rule as there look is based on the 40's pickup. interesting disscussion though :) -- http://www.kencofish.com Ken Arnold, 401-781-9642 cell 401-225-0556 Importer/Exporter of Goldfish,Koi,rare Predators Shipping to legal states/countries only! Permalon liners, Oase & Supreme Pondmaster pumps Linux (SuSE 8.2) user #329121 Please Note: No trees or animals were harmed in the sending of this contaminant free message We do concede that a signicant number of electrons may have been inconvenienced ;)
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |