
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Nate Nagel wrote:
Aardwolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
But it was a serious, bona-fide automobile from a real manufacturer. And it had some pretty sophisticated tricks for the early '60s--disc brakes and a rear stabilizer bar for instance. Not to mention real, bona fide style, right down to the detailing. They managed to get a pretty large amount of power out of 304 cubic inches, too, even if almost no cars were ever ordered with those particular engines. (FWIW, I actually like the looks of the last Hawks
Yuck! (aardwolf likes old guy cars... aardwolf likes old guy cars... :P)
Oh yeah?? Well... Well... So what if I do?
Well, the fact that *some* people like them I guess is success enough, I'm sure not everyone likes '54 Commander Starliners either (although I suspect those people of lacking souls)
--either those or the '55 Speedsters were the best looking ones, as far as I'm concerned.)
I'll agree with you there, so long as you graft a '54 nose on it. The dash and instruments of a Speedster could be a model for "how to lay out a plain yet elegant and functional instrument panel." Right up there with the early Porsche 911 IMHO. And besides, I've got a thing for leather seats.
Actually, as an overall styling job, I think I'd have to say the '55 four-doors are my favorites. Speedster nose and all. The '54s are really clean, but I just like that chrome-loop saber jet grille. Too bad none of the later sedans had Hawk styling, gaudier though it was.
As for leather--all I can say is "Not in Wisconsin". Definitely better than vinyl, nice look and smell, but what I really like is a nice, stiff, heavy duty German-style velour. Moderates seasonal temperature extremes and has a slight sort of velcro effect to help keep the occupant from sliding around in the seat.
--Aardwolf.
-- remove "horny" from my email address to reply.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |