
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Oliver, You now know 99% of what I gleaned from talking to those two. It did sound like it was going to be a little more capable performance wise than the F-Body, but that's it. Since the XUV fiasco, Mike et. cie. have been much more quiet. I did get my first publishing credit though - as the XUV was unveiled at the Chicago show and I was there Friday night and had pictures emailed to my friend with a web site before dinner, they were some of the first widely available pics of the XUV on the web and they were actually used by an Estonian auto magazine. I have a copy; I can't read it :/ nate Ennui Society <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Hello, > > Oh, does that mean the next incarnation of Avanti is possibly more > closer to original concept and execution albeit the modern technology? > > Oliver > > Nate Nagel wrote: > > [snip] > > > I spent some time talking to Mike Kelly at the Chicago Auto Show in > > February and supposedly Chuck Beck (yeah, that Chuck Beck) was involved > > to some extent in the design of a replacement, proprietary chassis for > > the "next" Avanti. That's all I know; both Mike and Chuck were very > > friendly but still very closed-mouthed about their plans. (of course, > > that makes sense - who wants to go divulging all their secret plots to > > one of those crazy Stude club guys?) Of course, that was 9 mos. ago and > > the XUV still isn't in production yet, which I was told was the first > > order of business. > > [snip]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |