Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)

On Wed, 03 Dec 03 10:54:53 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:

>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>   Bill Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Tue, 02 Dec 03 15:37:02 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lloyd Parker)
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>>>   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brent P) wrote:
>>>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, it'd be terrible if everybody were covered and we spent less on 
>>>health 
>>>>> care, as Europe, Canada, and Japan do, wouldn't it?  Terrible for 
>insurance 
>>>>> companies, drug companies, HMOs, etc, that is.
>>>>
>>>>How would we spend "less on health care" ? Instead of paying for health 
>>>>insurance we would pay *AT LEAST* that much in additional taxes. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Why is it, then, that every western European nation, plus Canada and Japan, 
>>>spend less per capita on health care than the US yet still cover everybody?
>>
>>Lloyd, you might want to do a Google search on the keywords:
>>canadian health care problems
>>This would let you see reality instead of the utopia your liberal
>>friends promise.
>>
>
>Oh great, he wants me to absorb his right-wing propaganda.
>
>Try this:
>
>http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/user/clamen/misc/politics/HealthCare/Co
>nsumerReports-Sep92.html.gz#Does%20Canada%20Have%20The%20Answer?

Consumer Reports???
You've GOT to be kidding.

-- 
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"