Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: 2.2L Tirbo engine Reliability??



Jesse wrote:

Hi everyone,
I know someone who has a 86 Chrysler New Yorker with 70,000 miles and a 2.2L
Turbo engine. I inspected and test drove it and looks great and runs very
well.
I was wondering if anyone had any feedback on the car or engine itself??

I currently own a '89 New Yorker (had it two months) with a 3.0L Mitsubishi
engine. It runs/looks great!

Thank you,

Jesse




A *well maintained* and properly driven 2.2 or 2.5 turbo engine is extremely reliable. The lower end of the engine itself shares the same bearing sizes as the old 440 and 426 Hemi v8 engines and can deliver well over 300 horsepower without mechanical failure (see some of the turbo minivan and turbo drag race websites). The net result is that it lasts forever at the normal output of <200 HP that the stock engine produces. It is sensitive to loss of coolant (cylinder head warping) and sensitive to certain types of abuse- namely shutting down the engine immediately after a period where the turbo is producing boost, which heat-soaks the turbo bearings and "cokes" the oil in the bearing. If you idle the engine for 30 seconds prior to shut down- no problem.

The engine itself is vastly superior to the 3.0L Mitsubishi you currently have, but the rest of the car is essentially identical. Any non-engine strengths and weaknesses you notice in the 89 should be similar in the 86 Turbo car.







<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.