
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Lloyd Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "The Ancient One" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >"Lloyd Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >Lloyd Parker wrote: > >> > > >> >> Yeah, it'd be terrible if everybody were covered and we spent less on > >> health > >> >> care, as Europe, Canada, and Japan do, wouldn't it? Terrible for > >insurance > >> >> companies, drug companies, HMOs, etc, that is. > >> > > >> >Many HMOs are not even for profit. > >> > >> Huh? They're all run by insurance companies, and they sure are for > >profit. > >> In most states, even Blue Cross is now for profit. > >> > >> > >> > And let's attack drug companies and put them > >> >out of business. > >> > >> 1. They earn a greater return on capital than any other industry. > >> 2. They take drugs discovered and tested with tax-funded research and make > >> huge profits on them. > >> 3. They do fine in other countries where they aren't allowed such > >exorbitant > >> profits. > >> > >> > >> > After all we can all just invent our own miracle drugs, > >> > >> Most are -- most new drugs come out of government-funded university > >research. > >> > >> > >> >so who > >> >needs pharmecutical companies? I'm sure you've contributed even more > >useful > >> drugs > >> >than average given your superior chemistry background. Finally, having > >the > >> >government do as a monopoly what the private sector can do is socialism > >you'd > >> end > >> >up spending far more under your socialism plan. > >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> But why not a single-payer, like Canada then? You wouldn't have > >national > >> >> health care, just national health insurance. > >> > > >> >Huh? Even HillaryClintonCare was forecast to cost in double digit > >TRILLIONS > >> of > >> >dollars. > >> > >> And what do you think we spend now on health care? > >> > >> > >> > And yes, the Canada care system with its people fleeing to the US to get > >> >needed healthcare would be an improvement in your alternate reality. > >> > >> Totally false. > > > >Totally true, reported many times in the news. Stop lying Parker, it doesn't > >work, we are all smarter than you, even my dog. > > It's false. Totally, absolutely false. Read: Oh great, more of your left wing propaganda. It's true Lloyd, learn to read, watch the news, open your mind. Consumer Reports, give me a break, what a sorry source of left wing lies. > > http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.edu/user/clamen/misc/politics/HealthCare/ Co > nsumerReports-Sep92.html.gz#Does%20Canada%20Have%20The%20Answer? > > > > >> > >> > >> > Trouble is > >> >where would the US people go that needed urgent care with the Canada > >system > >> here? > >> > > >> Why are Canadian retirees moving back to Canada? Why are American seniors > >> going their for their medicine? > > > > > >Big difference between buying medicine and receiving medical treatment, but > >you knew that, you just enjoy lying. > > > >
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |