Re: NRA ignores the *whole* Second Amendment was Re: Man shoots at noisy teenagers, killing one

"C.R. Krieger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in 
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> "Asmodeus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Cite your evidence for this drivel.
> 
> Speaking of drivel, ...
> 
>> Just exactly what part of "Shall Not Be Infringed" don't you understand?
> 
> Which part of "a well regulated militia" don't *you* understand?
> 
> Apparently, all of it.  Maybe you can get Yanik to help you.
> --
> C.R. Krieger
> (Who's read the *whole* Constitution.)
> 
> 
> 

Perhaps you could explain to me how "A well-regulated militia being 
necessary to a free state" modifies "the right of the people to keep and 
bear arms shall not be infringed".It does NOT say one has to be a militia 
member to have the right,nor does it reserve the right to militias.
It actually says nothing about the RKBA at all.It says militias are 
necessary to being free.

All the first part says is that a "well-regulated militia" is a good thing.

Of course,it helps to remeber that the US was formed by armed rebellion 
aginst the incumbent government,by weapons privately owned by the 
citizenry,and that after the struggle,the Founders did not want the 
citizens disarmed. In fact,the War began by the British moving to 
confiscate guns at Concord.

The 2nd Amendment is the "reset button" of the Constitution.Read the 
Declaration Of Independence,and pay attention to the part about "alter or 
abolish". The Founders intended that the People retain power over their 
government,power coming from the barrel of a gun(when the ballot box 
fails).

-- 
Jim Yanik,NRA member
jyanik-at-kua.net