
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
- __From__: Daniel J. Stern
- __Subject__: Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
- __Date__: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 10:59:44 -0600
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, C. E. White wrote:
4> no religion should be required to perform or recognize a marriage not
4> in keeping with its creed (doesn't the catholic church not recognize
4> marriages by divorced people?), but why should government discriminate?
3> Marriage is a union between a man and a woman.
2> If two men or two women want to be joined as a family in a marriage,
2> how does it detract from your marriage?
> It is not a marriage.
So, let's summarize. The question is "Why should marriage be restricted to
opposite-sex couples?" and the very best, most cogent response you can
come up with is "Because marriage is restricted to opposite-sex couples."
DS
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers), (continued)
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
Lloyd Parker
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
David J. Allen
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
David J. Allen
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
C. E. White
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
C. E. White
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
Daniel J. Stern
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
Brandon Sommerville
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
David J. Allen
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
Daniel J. Stern
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
C. E. White
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
Daniel J. Stern
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
C. E. White
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
Daniel J. Stern
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
Larry St. Regis
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
vlj
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
Lloyd Parker
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
Lloyd Parker
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
The Ancient One
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
The Ancient One
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
Bill Putney
- Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers),
Greg