Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)

Jerry McG wrote:

> "C. E. White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >
> >
> > > So are conservatives -- telling people what kind of sex to have, what
>
> genders
>
> > > can marry, what a woman can do with her body, etc.
> >
> > It is not just conservatives who oppose the redefinition of "marriage."
> > Any reasonable person should oppose this sort of reckless redefinition
> > of a long established legal / social / religious institution. If same
> > sex couples want to form a long term commitment to each other, I think
> > that is fine. If they feel they need a governmental sanction to this
> > commitment, then pass a law that creates a new class of civil union. But
> > trying to call this a "marriage" is an insult to millions of American
> > and serves no useful purpose.
> >
> > Ed
>
>
> Oh, sure it does, Ed, if recognized as "marriage" they then get  huge tax
> and benefits advantages, all of which are denied singles.

The "new class of civil union" would cover that just fine.