
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"John David Galt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > sachin wrote: > > The problem there is the rage, not the LLBs. > > > > LLBs may be highly pretentious self-proclaimed traffic police, or they may > > be just oblivious, eating their cheeseburgers with the music blasting...but > > don't blame them for road rage. That is a deeper problem. > > You're wrong on all counts. Rage against injustice is justified and rightful, > and demanding anyone let go of it without the injustice first being cured > simply makes you a supporter of criminals. Its so bizarre how people on this ng make sweeping general comments. Aunt Millie calls everyone who disagrees with her a 'criminal coddler', and now you're calling me a supporter of criminals because LLB's are supposedly performing an injustice. I agree that in some situations, when you are being injusticed, rage is justified. I also agree that LLBs are wrong. However unjust doesn't mean wrong, and LLBs are not performing any injustice to you. Now people will spout examples about emergencies, babies being born in the back seat, etc. But if you get stuck behind an LLB for a stretch of highway and it take a few minutes out of your commute, that does NOT justify road rage. One act of irrationality doesn't justify another.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |