Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)

On Wed, 03 Dec 03 10:46:25 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:

>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Greg wrote:
>>
>>> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>>"new source" creation, which was contrary to the actual written law.
>>>>
>>>>Wrong.  They started treating major modifications as new sources, which was
>>>>exactly what the law allowed (and required).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> MAJOR modifications.  Not minor improvements which would INCREASE 
>efficiency, such
>>> as a new version of wear items such as turbine blades.
>>> 
>>
>>
>>EXACTLY. Clinton policy = NO MODIFICATIONS!! Not even improvements to an 
>>old plant that would be better than doing nothing.
>
>Because the Clean Air Act only exempts _maintenance_ not _modifications_.

I see.
So making it BETTER brings on penalties, but keeping it dirty is OK?
How is this supposed to clean up the air?

-- 
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"