Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)

On Wed, 03 Dec 2003 13:00:25 -0500, "C. E. White"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>
>Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>> But why should government institutionalize discrimination?  OK, no religion
>> should be required to perform or recognize a marriage not in keeping with its
>> creed (doesn't the catholic church not recognize marriages by divorced
>> people?), but why should government discriminate?
>
>I am not suggesting that the government institutionalize discrimination. Marriage
>is a union between a man and a woman. It is not a same sex union. If there are
>particular laws related to the term "marriage" that make "marriages" beneficial
>and same sex unions feel they deserve these benefits, then change the law, or
>have the law ruled unconstitutional. Don't try to circumvent the process by
>redefining the word.

This confuses me greatly.  If two men or two women want to be joined
as a family in a marriage, how does it detract from your marriage?
-- 
Brandon Sommerville
remove ".gov" to e-mail

Definition of "Lottery":
Millions of stupid people contributing 
to make one stupid person look smart.