Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>    [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brent P) wrote:
>>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>> Need dialysis?  No hospital is  required to do that for free, for example.
>>
>>Government health care programs already cover dialysis.

> Most people aren't in such a program.

Most people aren't, but most people who are on dialysis will end up on one.

>> In fact the price
>>(LOW) the government pays is a if not the driving factor in care in this 
>>area. The government payment scheme for 3-times-a-week dialysis is 
>>a major obstacle to improving the quality of care, the quality of 
>>people's lives, and their surviviability. 
>>
>>I am really glad you made a point of dialysis parker, because it is one
>>treatment that is required to keep people with renal failure alive but one
>>where government price controls dominate what people get with regards
>>to care. It is a great example of the arrogant way government does things 
>>that has a negative effect on people. Want better care than 3 times a 
>>week? Government says you can't have it, they'll only pay for that. If 
>>you want something better, you better pay for it yourself or hope it can
>>work within the government 3-times-a-week cost model. You've stuck your 
>>foot in your mouth once again Parker. 


No response from parker, just one misleading sentance.