Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Jerry McG wrote:
>
>> "C. E. White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>>>
>>>Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>So are conservatives -- telling people what kind of sex to have, what
>> 
>> genders
>> 
>>>>can marry, what a woman can do with her body, etc.
>>>
>>>It is not just conservatives who oppose the redefinition of "marriage."
>>>Any reasonable person should oppose this sort of reckless redefinition
>>>of a long established legal / social / religious institution. If same
>>>sex couples want to form a long term commitment to each other, I think
>>>that is fine. If they feel they need a governmental sanction to this
>>>commitment, then pass a law that creates a new class of civil union. But
>>>trying to call this a "marriage" is an insult to millions of American
>>>and serves no useful purpose.
>>>
>>>Ed
>> 
>> 
>> Oh, sure it does, Ed, if recognized as "marriage" they then get  huge tax
>> and benefits advantages, all of which are denied singles.
>
>The "new class of civil union" would cover that just fine.
>
>
>
>
>
Didn't "separate but equal" get discredited in the 1950s?