Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brent P) wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>> Need dialysis?  No hospital is  required to do that for free, for example.
>
>Government health care programs already cover dialysis.

Most people aren't in such a program.


> In fact the price
>(LOW) the government pays is a if not the driving factor in care in this 
>area. The government payment scheme for 3-times-a-week dialysis is 
>a major obstacle to improving the quality of care, the quality of 
>people's lives, and their surviviability. 
>
>I am really glad you made a point of dialysis parker, because it is one
>treatment that is required to keep people with renal failure alive but one
>where government price controls dominate what people get with regards
>to care. It is a great example of the arrogant way government does things 
>that has a negative effect on people. Want better care than 3 times a 
>week? Government says you can't have it, they'll only pay for that. If 
>you want something better, you better pay for it yourself or hope it can
>work within the government 3-times-a-week cost model. You've stuck your 
>foot in your mouth once again Parker. 
>
>
>
>
>