
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.
- __From__: Goofball_star_dot_etal
- __Subject__: Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.
- __Date__: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 21:09:48 -0600
On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 09:47:42 +0000, Don Pearce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>No, you haven't understood.
>
I think I see the problem now. With your background you probably have
in the back of your mind a radio antenna where you can not have gain
in all directions and it is a matter of "squeezing the balloon" to
get gain. Now here is the crunch: A properly matched antenna is 100%
efficient but what if the antenna is a bit of wet string and 99% of
the power is reflected. Can this "bit of wet string" be improved upon?
There is no need to read what Svante and I have written if it must
violate your antenna law, right?
- Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples., (continued)
- Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.,
Don Pearce
- Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.,
Goofball_star_dot_etal
- Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.,
Don Pearce
- Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.,
Svante
- Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.,
Don Pearce
- Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.,
Goofball_star_dot_etal
- Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.,
Svante
- Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.,
gregs
- Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.,
Don Pearce
- Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.,
Svante
- Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.,
Goofball_star_dot_etal
- Re: Speaker sensitivity and fs in multiples.,
Svante