
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"dave weil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 18:07:35 -0800, "Michael Mckelvy" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >"dave weil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 16:03:31 -0800, "Michael Mckelvy" > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> >"clamnebula" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > >> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> I think it's worth noting here that even Merle Haggard recently > >recorded a > >> >> anti-war song. It'll be interesting to see if it gets any airplay, > >> >especially on > >> >> stations owned by the monolithic Clear Channel network, who are major > >Bush > >> >and > >> >> GOP supporters. > >> > > >> >How is Clear Channel monolithic? They have 10% of the market. > >> > >> Which market? > > > >Radio. > > Well, sorta. > > I only mentioned it to highlight what a one-dimensional thinker you > are. > > First of all, they have 10% of the ENTIRE radio market in the states, > but they have 50% of the POPULAR MUSIC stations in the country. > > Not only that, they control a substantial proportion of the concert > seats in the US. > > The synergy between those two markets (radio and concerts) well > exceeds the parts. > > They are far and away the largest players in the game. There's NOBODY > that's even close. I maintain that makes them monolithic. > Then realize you are an idiot by your own admission. 50% and significant portion do not equal monolithic.
| <-- __Chronological__ | <-- __Thread__ --> |