Re: Julian Hirsch, RIP

"Bruce J. Richman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>
>> "Bruce J. Richman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> Robert Morein wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Arny Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> http://www.nytimes.com/2003/12/03/arts/03HIRS.html
>>>>>
>>>>> "Julian Hirsch, an electrical engineer and writer who was among
>>>>> the first to help a growing audience of audiophiles sort through
>>>>> the good, the bad and the indifferent in electronic sound
>>>>> equipment, died on Nov. 24 in the Bronx. He was 81 and lived in
>>>>> New Rochelle, N.Y."
>>>>>
>>>> I loved that guy.
>>>>
>>>> I spotted him one day as I debarked from a NJ Transit train at Penn
>>>> Station. Quite a coincidence, as he wouldn't normally use that
>>>> station.
>>>>
>>>> He looked his picture, and had a radiant aura of contentment, good
>>>> will, and tolerance.
>>>
>>> "Good will and tolerance".  Perhaps that is why he left a legacy of
>>> fond remembrances.  Unfortunately for Krueger, he has demonstrated
>>> none of those qualities towards others on RAO - and his legacy has
>>> already been written. Interesting that 2 avowed objectivists have
>>> had such significantly different responses in their efforts to
>>> communicate.
>>
>> So tell us about your RAO legacy of "good will and tolerance",
>> Richman. I take it that this would be a good example of the same?

> Who is the "us" you are referring to, Krueger - aside from your
> friend, McKelvy, you would appear to be quite isolated - and its not
> because of your views, but rather because of the hostility and
> unprovoked personal attacks you constantly use to convey them.

Irrelevant to the question I asked, Richman. To repeat that which you are
avoiding dealing with, are these gratuitous attacks examples of your "good
will and tolerance"?

> Unlike you, Krueger, I don't engage in personal attacks simply
> because somebody doesn't agree with me.

Clearly Richman, no disagreement on my part is required. You just step right
up to my posts and start pissing away.

>Of course, in dealing with
> people such as yourself, that have engaged in unprovoked personal
> attacks against me, civil communication is apparently impossible.

Then Richman why bother to communicate at all? I thought you valued "good
will and tolerance"!

> But with a few notable exception such as yourself and McKelvy, no
> such problem exists.

You're not answering the questions I asked Richman. Why is that? Are they
too difficult? Are they over your head?