Re: What a riot

Arny Krueger wrote:


>"Bruce J. Richman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Arny Krueger wrote:
>>
>>
>>> "Bruce J. Richman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>
>>>> Agreed.  Arguing with Krueger about semantics changes nothing.  The
>>>> statement he made was clearly defamatory and false.  And the Google
>>>> record of his posts concerning you would also indicate that it was
>>>> made with malice.
>>>
>>> Richman, why do you repeatedly ignore the numerous times that your
>>> friends like Middius call me a "proven pedophile"?
>
>> Krueger, I'm not ignoring anything.
>
>Sure you are Richman. Your silence is deafening. Your historical role around
>here is to assist Middius in his foul deeds against me. You support his lies
>and libel against me virtually every chance you get.
>

Prove it!  You are lying again, Krueger.  Many of the negative comments made
about you constantly because of your despicable behavior are ignored by me.
Note whose names appear in this thread the most.  Mine is not among them.


>>The post I made was in response  to Mr. Wheeler's comment, nothing else.
>
>Richman, the posts you make have generally ignored any and all foul acts
>committed against me. This would partially be due to the fact that you are a
>leading perpetrator of such acts.
>

You are lying again, Krueger.  Part of your ongoing paranoia and desire to
create conspiracy theories, as the Google record clearly reflects.


>>  By the same token, I could
>>  ask you why you have ignored numerous libelous comments made about me
>>  by your friend McKelvy?
>
>I am generally unaware of them. Why don't you quote one for me and I'll
>comment on it.
>

So you are claiming you do not read and support McKelvy's libelous comments
against me?  I don't believe you.  You are known among all as his primary
supporter and defender.  The 2 of you act as a team to prop up each other and
defend each other's libelous false claims against all who disagree with you.  



>> The fact remains that you are currently being sued by Mr. Wheeler for
>> libel. It appears the courts will decide whether or not his suit has
>> merit.
>
>The fact remains Richman that you're a one-sided source of information, and
>habitually ignore attacks on me when you aren't assisting with them. This of
>course ruins any pretense of objectivity that you might want to maintain.
>
>

Given your history of compulsive lying on RAO about myself and many others,
your credibility is zero.  You have no objectivity whatsoever and routinely
attack all who disagree with your anti-personal--preference, anti-subjectivist,
anti-vinyl and anti-tube biases.  As others have pointed out, you never admit
errors, constantly engage in personal attacks towards many who don't share your
zealous biases, and unlike anybody else on RAO, seem to have attracted more
"enemies" (your words, not mine) than virtually any other poster.



Bruce J. Richman