Re: What a riot

"Bruce J. Richman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Arny Krueger wrote:
>
>
>> "Bruce J. Richman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>> Agreed.  Arguing with Krueger about semantics changes nothing.  The
>>> statement he made was clearly defamatory and false.  And the Google
>>> record of his posts concerning you would also indicate that it was
>>> made with malice.
>>
>> Richman, why do you repeatedly ignore the numerous times that your
>> friends like Middius call me a "proven pedophile"?

> Krueger, I'm not ignoring anything.

Sure you are Richman. Your silence is deafening. Your historical role around
here is to assist Middius in his foul deeds against me. You support his lies
and libel against me virtually every chance you get.

>The post I made was in response  to Mr. Wheeler's comment, nothing else.

Richman, the posts you make have generally ignored any and all foul acts
committed against me. This would partially be due to the fact that you are a
leading perpetrator of such acts.

>  By the same token, I could
>  ask you why you have ignored numerous libelous comments made about me
>  by your friend McKelvy?

I am generally unaware of them. Why don't you quote one for me and I'll
comment on it.

> The fact remains that you are currently being sued by Mr. Wheeler for
> libel. It appears the courts will decide whether or not his suit has
> merit.

The fact remains Richman that you're a one-sided source of information, and
habitually ignore attacks on me when you aren't assisting with them. This of
course ruins any pretense of objectivity that you might want to maintain.