Re: What a riot

"dave weil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:25:36 -0500, "Arny Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> "dave weil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:09:16 -0500, "Arny Krueger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> Not that the level of  discourse has changed one bit,
>>>>> mind you, but at least they're bickering about the real world for
>>>>> a change (although no more than a handful seem to have any grasp
>>>>> that the world they're now bitching about is any different than
>>>>> the nothingness they used to bitch about).
>>>>
>>>> Nice try at trying to cover up your many factual blunders, Sanders.
>>>
>>> You mean like lying about anonyminity on your web site?
>>
>> Weil, why don't you say something substantiative about this so I can
>> deconstruct it.
>
> I've already done it, but you were afraid to address it the first  time.

Well, you just made an equally-vague claim in another post. Is that what
you're talking about?

> Are you saying that if I address it again, you might actually address
> it *this* time?

What's unclear about the word "substantiative"?

Ohh, I'm talking to Weil. <engage speaking to a dumbass mode> What I mean is
describe the means by which one of my web sites obtains personal information
about people who browse it or download files from it.