Re: Audiophile glossary

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:>
>Re:  Harry Pearson of TAS
>If he really knew what he was doing, he would correlate the results of
>listening 
>tests with measurments.  
>

I went back into my audio publication archives last night and found some copies
of "High Performance/Review", an interesting audio equipment review magazine
that was published from 1981 to about 1985.  In it, the writers attempted to
closely correlate the sound of the equipment they listened to with technical
measurements, such as harmonic distrotion, etc. (Larry Greenhill, of the
infamous published cable dbt was a reviewer for this mag before he joined
Stereophile.) I suspect the magazine failed because there are not enough
readers who care about the correlation of measurements to observational
listening results.  While there may be a few people on RAHE wanting to see
these kind of correlations, I'm not sure this is represenative of the
audiophile readership universe.
Regards,
Mike