Re: Audiophile glossary

Harry Lavo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It would be nice if this bit of TAS-bashing was put to rest with this kind
> of factual information, but I doubt it will happen.  Harry Pearson not only
> published frequency response ranges from 30hz to 20khz tied (accurately) to
> descriptive terms, he also published (several times) glossaries of
> terminology used in the magazine, in order to foster broad-understanding of
> those terms.  He also, I know for a fact, issued preliminary versions of
> this glossary very early on to his reviewers and advised them *not* to use
> the terms with alternative meanings.

If he really knew what he was doing, he would correlate the results of listening 
tests with measurments.  That he choses to play pope is transparent.