
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 11/30/03 12:24 AM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "normanstrong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Michael Scarpitti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (CCSman) wrote in message > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >>> My room is 14 x 24, and the back, ie, listening area, open up into > a dining >>> room. Using a Radio Shack SPL meter, it seems that I rarely get a > reading of >>> 85 dB, let alone 80 dB (at the listening position). So, let's say > max, average >>> listeing level, 85 dB. Speakers are listed at 87 dB efficiency, > at 6 ohms, >>> dropping to a low of 3 ohms. How much power is adequate for my > needs, assuming >>> I also want some margin and not run an amp at the limit? >>> >>> Thanks in advance! >> >> I'd say at least 150WPC. > > First of all, it's not a matter of opinion, it's a matter of > calculation. Secondly, "87db efficiency, at 6 ohms, dropping to a low > of 3 ohms" doesn't make any sense. Is that exactly the way the > manufacturer stated it? Efficiency is a dimensionless quantity that > is very difficult to measure, and of little importance. The number > you gave is probably the voltage sensitivity. > > Second, how long does the impedance linger around 3 ohms, and where in > the frequency range does this occur? It sounds to me like a 4 ohm > speaker--not 6. There are a *lot* of speakers that are specified that way - partly because if you see the actual impedance plot of the speaker, you would reveal your idea about the crossover design style. If I had a amplifier that was sensitive to load (like a tube amp) and had a 4 and 8 ohm tap - I would start with the 4 ohm tap, like you said, and then try the 8 ohm and figure out what would sound better.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |