
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
http://installer.com/tech/aiming2.html Ok TOM, here are the tests I finally got around to running (today) Unlike your BOGUS made up tests, I have pictures as well as witnesses to back up my claims.... ha ha Click on the link above to see what I did today... I cant wait to hear your excuses.... Eddie Runner http://installer.com/tech/aiming2.html Nousaine wrote: > s7oned [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >i have heard putting subs at the back facing forward have more > >cancellation issues due to wave bouncing off the back end and > >cancelling the front wave...i read it in a website... > > You can also read about alien visits on websites too. At bass wavelengths (17 > feet @ 60 Hz and much longer at lower frequencies) there just aren't any > "cancellation" issues going on in the car cabin. > > In your living room the standing wave region will occur in the bass range > (roughly 30 to 300 Hz) but in a much smaller space this is shifted up by about > an octave (60 to 600 Hz in a small car.) > > But even at 60 Hz any 'cancellations' will occur at a fraction of a wavelength > (200-300 Hz) and not at the fundamental. > > and according to > >it.. subs facing back and as close to the trunklid or hatch USUALLY > >yeild best results. > > Often it will; but not for the reasons stated on that website. The only > advantage of subwoofer orientation is that facing the woofer/port away from the > listener reduces the possibility that mid-range sounds and driver/box/port > noises will be less likely to be audible. > > .HOWEVER..i recommend you try them out and see whats > >better...shouldnt take too much effort. > >-- > >s7oned > > Good idea.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |