Re: Michael Jackson

For that matter I don't understand what all the fuss was about.
Michael Jackson was just caught "in the moment". I'm confident
that he knew he could hold the infant safely.

Sensationalism. Just because he's rich and famous.

- Michaela

"SSeaW" <IThinkIWillRemainE-MailLESS:)> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Uhm, you are just now discovering this?  This is like VERY old news.  What
> rock have you been living under?
>
>
> "Jim Summers87" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > When I got home, my mother asked me if I'd heard about the latest
> > stunt by Michael Jackson; I hadn't.
> >
> > We just saw it on the news: he dangled his own infant son -- Prince
> > Michael II -- over a balcony railing.
> >
> > It's disgusting footage.
> >
> > The baby was kicking with its head covered, and hit its leg on the
> > balcony railing. Anything could have happened -- the baby could have
> > easily slipped his grasp or had its clothing snap open, resulting in
> > it plummeting several stories.
> >
> > Since it happened in Germany, I doubt it can be used in a court here
> > in the US to get those children away from him. It's vile and creepy
> > that he has his own children, and this reckless endangerment only
> > proves it. How the fuck is this freak of nature allowed to continue
> > with this?
> >
> > I'm serious -- this is disturbing footage, folks, else I wouldn't be
> > going off like this.
> >
>
>