
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Graham Kennedy wrote: > Mike Dicenso wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, lyon_wonder wrote: > > > > > >>>Also: ground transport. Aside from the dune-buggy in "Nemesis," and > >>>mention of "skimmers" during the Dominion War, there's no evidence of Starfleet > >>>ground vehicles. > >> > >>And why did those ground vehicles that Picard used in "Nemesis" > >>utilize old-fashioned wheels and suspension that don't look too far > >>removed from vehicles in the 20/21st century? Obviously, in the late > >>24th century, this is long after hover vehicles and flaying cars were > >>invented. > > > > > > Because a wheel and suspension vehicle is not prone to any weird > > technobabble particle of the week, or whatever that will cut power to the > > hovercraft/flying cars' antigravity propulsion and cause it to fall, and > > be destroyed. > > Nor does it put out radiation/particles which can be detected > by every enemy scanner within a thousand kilometres. Well, that I don't know about.... The vehicle could operate on a fuel cell technology, but even that puts out some kind of energy emission, though at a much lower level than maybe a fusion or some other kind of power source would. -Mike
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |