
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Joseph Nebus" wrote... > "Chris Basken" writes: > >Since the time travelers themselves came from the natural timeline, it was > >theoretically possible for one to go back and alter history so that he was > >never born, but Asimov's take on the process was that such precision was > >nearly impossible. That is, the time travelers didn't leap forward and > >backwards over the span of years or centuries, but whole millennia at a time, > >because it was hard to control exactly when you "landed." > > Er ... I think you've convoluted ``The End Of Eternity'' with > ``The Ugly Little Boy.'' In ``The Ugly Little Boy'' the time travel > mechanism used could only dimly focus -- and in its first iteration could > not focus on anything nearer than about 50,000 years in the past -- but in > ``The End of Enternity'' tight control was possible, indeed, essential. > The changes made in the timeline were made in niches as little as a couple > minutes wide. Hm, now I'll have to reread EoE (it's been a while). I've never actually read Ugly Little Boy... I think maybe because they dealt with such huge swathes of time in EoE, I'm misremembering the process.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |