Re: I'd love to see the full version of Nemesis

"Panon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:18:38 +1100, "MonkeeBoy"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Mark Morrison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:04:17 +1000, zaphy
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 10:42:25 GMT, "Me - The Real one!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>"John Leister" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >> >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> >>> With the 45 minutes they cut restored to the film.
> >> >>>
> >> >>Maybe that missing 45 minutes was all the good stuff?
> >> >
> >> >Give it a rest, trollboy.
> >>
> >> Oh, Nemesis blew.
> >>
> >> Accept it, most Trek fans do.
> >
> >What annoyed me was that it broke the rule that odd numbered trek films
> >suck.
>
> Considering the first, third and seventh films didn't suck, that's
> been a broken theory for a long, long time.

Actually it was true until Nemesis but Nemesis was so bad in comparison to
the others that it shifted the others up the scale somewhat. All except for
5 that is.