
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"JoatSimeon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >From: "lewy" [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written > > >Well, if you view the Confederacy as a distillate of unadulterated Evil, that > perplexity is I suppose understandable. > > -- well, the sole reason for the Confederacy's existance was to defend and > extend the institution of chattel slavery. > > If this isn't Evil, what is? Or maybe you don't think slavery _was_ evil? I assume you've read my other post upstream and have an answer to your question. I'll just expand on my original comment and write that if you view the Confederacy as a distillate of unadulterated Evil it's not surprising if you then interpret any debate over the cause of the Civil War as an attempt to "slam Lincoln and defend the Confederacy", as the original poster wrote.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |