
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Neutronium cutting (Google response is screwed up again)
- __From__: Johnny1A
- __Subject__: Neutronium cutting (Google response is screwed up again)
- __Date__: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 07:51:38 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Johnny1A) writes:
>
> >Assuming we have the technology to direct a beam of appropriate
> >anti-particles, I wonder if you could 'cut' a chunk out of a neutron
> >star...
>I was given to understand that it's basically a near-zero-viscosity
>superfluid, and you could no more "carve" it then you could carve a
>raindrop.
Probably true. I wasn't really being serious, beyond trying to think
of _something_ known to current physics that might affect neutronium
usefully. Pretty much anything intuitive is untrustworth at billions
of gees.
Shermanlee
- Re: neutron star question (was: Neutronium), (continued)
- Re: neutron star question (was: Neutronium),
Richard D. Latham
- Re: neutron star question (was: Neutronium),
Stan
- Re: neutron star question (was: Neutronium),
Daniel Frankham
- Re: neutron star question (was: Neutronium),
John F. Carr
- Re: neutron star question (was: Neutronium),
Anthony Cerrato
- neutron star question (was: Neutronium),
Robert Carnegie
- Re: neutron star question (was: Neutronium),
John F. Carr
- Re: neutron star question (was: Neutronium),
Paul F. Dietz
- Re: neutron star question (was: Neutronium),
Johnny1A
- Re: neutron star question,
Johnny1A
- Neutronium cutting (Google response is screwed up again),
Johnny1A
- Re: neutron star question (was: Neutronium),
phil hunt
- Re: neutron star question (was: Neutronium),
Mark Atwood
Re: Picotechnology?,
Jordan179