Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Tower situation



Jasper Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On 25 Nov 2003 06:12:51 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron Sanders) wrote:
> >Erik Steiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
>  
> >Question:
> >
> >Why do you write "whit" *repeatedly* for "with"
>  [..]
> >but you don't write "wath" for "what?" Just curious, because you do it
> >every time, so it can't be a typo =)
> 
> Transposition of characters is the easiest of typoes to amke, and can be

LOL!

> extremely consistent as well. The i and the a are on entirely different
> bits of the keyboard, so have vastly different hand positions, and thus a
> correspondingly different chance of a certain trnasposition happening.
> 
> Jasper

Interesting. Still, I would be more likely to have left it alone if I
found a single "with" spelled correctly. That's very strange, to do it
every time, no?

-Aaron



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.