
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Jasper Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > On 25 Nov 2003 06:12:51 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron Sanders) wrote: > >Erik Steiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > >Question: > > > >Why do you write "whit" *repeatedly* for "with" > [..] > >but you don't write "wath" for "what?" Just curious, because you do it > >every time, so it can't be a typo =) > > Transposition of characters is the easiest of typoes to amke, and can be LOL! > extremely consistent as well. The i and the a are on entirely different > bits of the keyboard, so have vastly different hand positions, and thus a > correspondingly different chance of a certain trnasposition happening. > > Jasper Interesting. Still, I would be more likely to have left it alone if I found a single "with" spelled correctly. That's very strange, to do it every time, no? -Aaron
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |