
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 03:45:54 +0000 (UTC), Daniel Packman said... > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Duncan J Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip> > >I'm thinking that the central states are just a tad _too_ > >conservative. > > (assuming you are referring to the US) Yup. > Yes, there are going to be many states that will be at > odds with the Mass. court. It seems inevitable that this > issue will find itself in the Supreme Court if not also in a > constitutional amendment. I would expect the court case to go first. > As much as the makeup of the court > is highly flawed, Yeah, too many wishy-washy liberals. > I think they have very firm constitutional > footing to sustain the Mass. case via full faith and credit > to other states. Considering the general state of idiocy in > this country, I don't have such a sanguine view about the > impossibility of a homophobic amendment passing. While Prohibition, as an example, made it through, I really don't think that another attempt to legislate morals at that level will work. There are sufficient levels of difficulty involved in the process of amendment. -- Duncan J Macdonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |