Re: [ENT+] Re: Changing rules for Time Travel

On 04 Dec 2003 00:54:28 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ANIM8Rfsk)
wrote:

><< From: "GeneK" [EMAIL PROTECTED]  >>
>
>
><< I'm not watching Enterprise regularly >>
>
>Good man.
>
>
><< It doesn't make
>sense that some changes in the timeline would take longer to "reach
>the future" than others. >>
>
>No
>
>
><<  However, it's conceivable that small changes in
>the timeline might be made at many different points between past and
>future and not be noticed >>
>
>That's not what we're talking about.  The 31st Century starfleet timecops
>haven't yet noticed that the probe carved a swath out of Florida and killed
>millions, and that it came back and BLEW UP THE ENTIRE EARTH.

Actually they have noticed.  Otherwise Daniels would have asked Archer
what he was talking about.  What they don't seem to have done is
decided what to do about it or if anything can be done about it.