Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Howard Stern's quit Angel due to darkness (Re: Why is Angel filmed so dark?



On Wed, 3 Dec 2003 17:40:36 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (The
Ghost of Grandpa Hole) wrote:

>poldy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
>
>>Yes it's suppose to be a "dark" series but
>>when you can't see the action, particularly
>>the fighting sequences, what's the point? 
>>Maybe they can't afford fancy stunts so
>>they mask it so you can't see it? 
>
>>Or they can't afford proper film stock or
>>developing? 
>
>I heard Howard mention on today's show that he's quit watching "Angel"
>due to the show being so damn dark he can't see what the Hell is taking
>place on screen! Robin agreed with Howard's assessment. 
>
>Apparently, this isn't the first time he's mentioned the darkness of the
>show this season, because someone at Mutant Enemy heard Howard's
>previous comments and sent him a letter telling him it was the WB's
>doing and that the show looks fine when they send the final cuts of the
>shows off, they even sent Howard a DVD that Howard said did look better.
>Howard said he'd bring the letter in tomorrow to read it on the air.
>
>As anyone that's ever listened to Howard knows he's always been an
>ardent supporter of both Buffy, and Angel.

Evidently this is just a cheap ploy by Howard to get free _Angel_ DVDs
ahead of everybody else.

Cheers,

Jaime



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.