
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 02:01:05 -0800, pervect <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I had the wrong model last time. The problem has to be worked from an inertial frame. For the Earth-moon system, if you ignore the sun for the time being, the proper point to consider is the center of mass of the earth-moon system. Looking at it from this point of view, you are nearly (but not quite) stationary near the COM point, and the moon is circling around this point. Because of the cavorite you won't feel the earth's gravity, but the moon will. For ease of visualization, consider the moon to be mounted on a giant invisible arm, like a planetary orrey, and constrained to move in (roughly) a circle about the COM point. When you shut off the earth's gravity to your spaceship with the cavorite, the moon continues to circle around this point. The quickest route to the moon woulldn't be to leave the cavorite open all the time. For the first half-month or so, your vector would have components in the right direction, but then you'd start to slow yourself down again. By the previous calculation the trip would take at least 2 months - I.e. if the moon weren't a moving target, you'd fall to its surface in 2.25 months under its gravity. See the previous post for details, this figure was calculated as 1/4 the orbital period of an orbit around the moon with the major axis of the orbit being the earth-moon distance. Matching the moon's orbital velocity is still going to be a problem. If you want to include the sun in the analysis (and assuming you shut off the sun's gravity with the cavorite), build a bigger orrey, with the sun in the center, a 93 million mile arm to the Earth-moon system, and a 250,000 mile arm to the moon. The effects of the sun's gravity will be significant, because even if your trip takes only 2 months (the minimum) you'll have moved 1/6 of an orbit around the sun
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |