
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Stoned koala bears drooled eucalyptus spittle in awe as <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> declared: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Bacon) wrote: > >> Chris Dollin wrote: >> >> IOW, I would avoid sexual explicitness unless you have a very >> > specific >> >> *need* for it. I don't see any need here. >> > >> >And as another datapoint, I see no specific need to *avoid* it. >> >Why shouldn't we write what we mean, and mean what we write? >> >> You can write whatever the hell you want. If you expect people to read >> it and >> like it, you have to take other people into consideration. > > But since, fortunately, there are books out there to every taste, the > reader doesn't have to pitch a hissy fit if every one of them doesn't > censor sexual description . . . Hmm. All I can say is, Justin better not buy a copy of "Iron Sunrise". There's something in it that's not a million miles away from rape, told in explicit detail, for reasons absolutely vital and intrinsic to the plot. (Never mind the friendly consensual sex.) Incidentally, am I the only person here who finds it a lot harder and more demanding to write *bad* sex than happy-fun-good sex? -- Charlie
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |