Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Rec Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Review: Matrix Reloaded, The (2003)



THE MATRIX RELOADED
Rating: 3.5/5 stars

REVIEW BY JOHN ULMER

I didn't quite know what to expect going into "The Matrix Reloaded," and I 
came out with mixed feelings. This is a sequel to the 1999 film that 
enthralled audiences. I was a bit underwhelmed by the original, and so I 
figured the sequel would either be better given my disappointment in the 
first, or even worse. There's no doubt it's a good film, but it has some 
very bleak, almost corny scenes with long, metaphorical speeches. There is 
either too much or too little thought put into this film.

It takes place, supposedly, a few days after the original. Neo can fly, 
Trinity wears tighter and shinier leather costumes, and Morpheus is fatter. 
Neo dreams that Trinity dies in the opening sequence. Then back in Zion they 
realize that 250,000 sentinals are digging their way into Zion. In order to 
stop something they need something that does something which involves, 
though does not limit to, throwing a huge orgy, kissing Persephone (Monica 
Belluci), rescuing a Keymaker, having a long car chase, beating up people, 
cloning Unleashed Agent Smiths (who appears not nearly as often as the 
trailer would lead you to believe), and blowing up things.

This film's plot goes to waste very quickly and so it falls back on special 
effects. They're great, yes, but not very different from all the 
"Matrix"-rip-off films we've been getting since the original. The beginning 
sequence wows the audience with terrific special effects, but later in the 
film they must have run short on their budget because Neo's fight with the 
million Agent Smiths is as cheesy as believing Dick Clark isn't dead yet. Or 
as cheesy as that joke. Either one works.

This summer has been a big sequel summer. "X-Men 2," "Terminator 3," "Tomb 
Raider 2." "The Matrix Reloaded" beats out one of those films; I don't think 
I have to spell out which one to you. (*Cough* "Tomb Raider 2" *cough*.) 
"Terminator 3" was a special effects extravaganza but it had more fun in it 
than this film. "X-Men 2" not only had a great continuation with its 
characters going on but also some truly terrific action sequences. "The 
Matrix Reloaded" really only has some good action scenes, which includes a 
highway chase atop of cars, trucks, motercycles and more, that goes on and 
on for seventeen minutes. Action fans will eat it up.

But it's not exactly the smartest of films. It thinks it's really smart, it 
tries to prove it, but scenes like that with "The Architect" (NOT the 
Archeologist) prove the movie is out of ideas. It tries to continue the 
smartness and freshness of the first film and tries to have revelations, but 
they confused me because the film moved through all the plot scenes too 
quickly so they could return to the action. Maybe they will be all sorted 
out in "The Matrix Revolutions," which opens in November. I certainly hope 
so.

"The Matrix" may not have been one of my favorite films but I did like it to 
a certain degree. It seemed pretty smart and a breakthrough achievment in 
special effects. It targeted all filmgoers - from sci-fi to action to drama 
to romance - whereas "The Matrix Reloaded" really only targets two audiences 
- die-hard fans of the original and sci-fi-lovers. That's probably one of 
its biggest of many flaws.

But it is still a pretty good movie.

- John Ulmer
Webmaster of The Movie Portal
http://www.wiredonmovies.com/

Updated daily, offers over one thousand free movie scripts and hundreds of 
free reviews, plus posters, sounds, quotes, and more.

==========
X-RAMR-ID: 35860
X-Language: en
X-RT-ReviewID: 1200732
X-RT-TitleID: 1122457
X-RT-SourceID: 1382
X-RT-AuthorID: 6769
X-RT-RatingText: 3.5/5




<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.