
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"George Shelps" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Lincoln Spector wrote: > > >The negative is that you get a grainier > >picture. > > The other major negative is that you > get a "cramped" quality that stems from > cropping to fit the anamorphic aspect > ratio and the concomitant loss of the > angle of coverage associated with > real anamorphic. That's a fault of the people making the film. There's no reason you have to shoot S35 to look cramped or anamorphic to not look cramped. Lincoln
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |