
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
http://www.colbycosh.com/#wess We are seven I spent the last couple of nights watching and thinking on Seven Samurai, a work of art that must intimidate just about every creative person who sees it. A lot of people who discuss Seven Samurai get distracted awful quick: they offer ill-considered apologies for its populist, audience-winning qualities--easy to overestimate, considering the number of times it has been remade for Western audiences in disguise--or serve up bull about the historical setting of the movie, which is important as far as "It was a period of anarchy", and not one bit further. Farmers vs. bandits: this is pretty elemental, cross-cultural stuff. I wonder, do the people looking for a message about Japan in Seven Samurai think Antony and Cleopatra is about Egypt? It is almost as if, more than fifty years after the sensation created by Rashomon, Western writers still believe Kurosawa was some sort of genius naïf who somehow just sprouted like a plant in the soil of postwar Japan. Seven Samurai is an awfully knowing film, isn't it, coming from someone who was supposedly mirroring his culture passively and regurgitating simple lessons from badly-translated Westerns? Is there a screenwriter alive who wouldn't have been proud to devise the wonderful, subtle misdirection involved in the plotting of Rikichi's character? Rikichi is the farmer who first gets the idea to hire samurai and fight against the bandits. From the first minute of the picture it's obvious that something's gnawing at him; everybody in the village has suffered, but Rikichi's rage is special. Kurosawa and his fellow screenwriters drop hints in our path, broad enough so that we're satisfied we know what's behind Rikichi's agony. "They tear infants from the womb," he splutters about the bandits. One of the samurai finds women's clothing in a sack in his house, enraging him. Ah, we surmise, the bandits have killed his wife. And so we are very carefully prepared for a devastating Act III surprise. An easy thing to forget if you've watched the movie a lot, and a nice thing to rediscover. The most indelible impression is left by Mifune, naturally. It is said that he never, to the end of his life, tired of performing scenes from the movie for fans. Mifune possessed (probably because of his upbringing outside Japan and his lack of formal thespian training) a bestial quality that always erupts right through the cultivated subtlety of his fellow Japanese actors. Another thing I started to notice in this viewing of Seven Samurai was the myriad of ways in which Mifune's/Kikuchiyo's animalistic, literally wild nature is emphasized. Talk about the role of one's life! Mifune plays up this character-theme interstitially, by means of constant bellowing, cackling, and scratching; but notice at how many points is it echoed and promulgated in the screenplay. Consider the scene where the six real samurai watch Mifune from a high cliff as he undresses beside a pool below a waterfall, wades in, crouches, disappears underwater, and emerges triumphantly with a fish--just as if he were a bear. Immediately after, he ambushes the samurai whimsically in the forest--again, like a bear, or perhaps an ape. Or walk backward to the preceding scenes, in which Mifune keeps accosting Takashi Shimura, like a hound seeking a pack leader, and finding himself utterly inarticulate, screwing up his face comically--unable to come out and make the relatively simple request for discipleship with which the boy samurai Katsushiro, obviously brought up with a confident feeling for warrior directness encompassed within polite forms, has no trouble. Let it be remembered, however, that this wild creature's particular brand of heroism stands in elegant counterpoint to that of Kyuzo (Seiji Miyaguchi), the affectless master swordsman, the paragon of efficiency and perfection who could be described metaphorically as a machine if his fencing were not so beautiful, so floral. Miyaguchi's performance is almost as memorable as Mifune's, or it would be if he were as recognizable to Western audiences. The seven-ness of the samurai is a red herring, in a sense: these two, I think, are the true thing. Do you notice that Kikuchiyo makes his most terrible error when trying to imitate Kyuzo's action in seizing one of the bandits' guns? And that one dies revenging the other? It's rather amusing that the nonpareil movie of male camaraderie, of sweat and leather and violence, has a heart made from the stuff of philosophy... -- Reply to mike1@@@usfamily.net sans two @@, or your reply won't reach me. "An election is nothing more than an advance auction of stolen goods." -- Ambrose Bierce
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |